For Immediate Release: 24 June 2015 Contact:
(Contacts by country listed under quotes)
Top UN Human Rights Experts say TPP a concern for human
rights: human rights evaluation must precede negotiations
Geneva ─After ten United
Nations experts said that the TPP[1], the Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement, and the TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership could potentially harm human rights, prominent human rights
voices in TPP countries sounded the alarm calling for a halt to further TPP
negotiations until proper human rights impact
assessments are done. Amongst others, these include former Commissioners from
the Malaysian and New Zealand Human Rights Commissions, Oxfam America, The
Council of Canadians (Canada), Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network (Australia), Human Rights
Now (Japan), Derechos Digitales (Chile), Health Action International Peru, The Project
of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Mexico).
On June 2nd, 10 United Nations
human rights experts expressed concern about the TPP’s potential adverse impact
on human rights. They recommended that
human rights impact assessments (HRIAs) should be done for the TPP before the
negotiations go any further.
They criticized the extreme secrecy around
the talks and ISDS, the Investor-State Dispute Settlement provisions which
allow foreign corporations to sue countries over laws and policies which curtail
their profit on investments. The
rapporteurs said that this would have a chilling effect on countries’ ability
to enact laws to protect environmental and social standards.[2]
They also drew attention to the potential
detrimental impact these treaties and agreements may have on the enjoyment of
human rights as enshrined in legally binding instruments, whether civil,
cultural, economic, political or social, saying, ‘Our concerns relate to the
rights to life, food, water and sanitation, health, housing, education, science
and culture, improved labour standards, an independent judiciary, a clean
environment.’
Final negotiations could happen as early as
two weeks after the adoption of fast track authority, a bill which would
accelerate the adoption of the TPP by the U.S. Congress. Attempts to get fast
track authority through the US Congress are continuing.
The TPP is an all-encompassing free trade
agreement currently being negotiated between 12 countries: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan,
Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.
Social, environmental, and labour regulations, privacy, medicine costs, public
services, financial regulation and farming are some of the issues affected by
this agreement.
Comments
from country experts:
Malaysia
Muhammad
Sha’ani Abdullah, a former Commissioner of the
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
(Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)) and Deputy Secretary General of the Society
for the Promotion of Human Rights (Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia, PROHAM)
said that ‘in light of the concerns expressed and recommendations by the ten
United Nations human rights experts, SUHAKAM must do a human rights impact
assessment on the TPPA before any further TPPA negotiations are held or
decisions are made on the TPPA. The
Malaysian government must provide sufficient funding to SUHAKAM to conduct such
a human rights impact assessment.’
Contact: Muhammad Sha’ani Abdullah: mdshaani@gmail.com,
mobile phone +6013-3363647
New
Zealand
‘The Human Rights Foundation of Aotearoa
New Zealand (HRF) is calling on the New Zealand Human Rights Commission to
undertake a human rights impact assessment for the TPPA (and for the government
to adequately resource the HRC to do so) before TPPA negotiations go any
further. This is in light of concern expressed by 10 United Nations human
rights experts about the TPPA’s potential adverse impact on human rights.’
—Peter
Hosking, Chairperson, HRF and former Commissioner at the New Zealand Human Rights Commission
Contact: Peter Hosking, peterhosking@vodafone.co.nz,
mobile phone: +6421660275
Japan
Kazuko Ito, the Secretary General of Japan based Human Rights Now (http://hrn.or.jp/eng/) said that ‘the
concerns raised by the UN experts deserve the utmost consideration at the TPPA
negotiation table. We are gravely
concerned that the negotiation process totally excludes communities which may
be affected, and denies rights to information and participation. Further we are concerned that a wide range of
human rights protection in Japan will be at stake as a result of the
negotiation, especially in relation to the ISDS section. Japan should make all necessary efforts to
prevent any deterioration of the human rights situation for people potentially
affected by the TPPA.’
Contact: Kazuko
Ito, info@hrn.or.jp, office phone+81-3-3835-2110
Peru
Javier Llamoza, from Acción Internacional para la Salud de Perú
(Health Action International, Peru), said that ‘the TPP is a major new
obstacle to Peru’s ability to meet the need for treatment to which all people
are entitled, and to improve the care provided by the public health system,
which primarily serves the poor and extremely poor. The human right to health
is seriously threatened by this agreement.’
Contact: Javier Llamoza, Acción
Internacional para la Salud – Red Ge, javierllamoza@aislac.org,
mobile phone: +51998603206
Australia
‘The UN
rapporteurs’ statement underlined the concerns of Australian community
organisations that the TPP could have a negative impact on many areas of human
rights. The TPP text should be released now to enable a full Human Rights
Impact Assessment of the TPP,’ said Dr
Patricia Ranald Coordinator of the Australian
Fair Trade and Investment Network (AFTINET).
Contact: Dr Patricia Ranald, AFTINET, campaign@aftinet.org.au, mobile
phone: +61 419 695 841
Canada
‘Human
rights are the fundamental basis for all societies. It is essential that we know the true human
cost of such agreements before we even consider them. Considering the scope and power of the TPP,
and how most of us have no access to the details, it is definitely concerning
that governments don’t stop and consider what they are getting into. Another round of negotiations is ludicrous in
this context.’
— Maude Barlow, National Chairperson, Council of
Canadians, Canada
Contact: Leila Marshy, Media Relations, Council of Canadians, lmarshy@canadians.org, mobile phone
+1613 618-4761
Chile
‘If
democracy is really about the active participation of the citizens in political
decisions and the protection of their basic human rights, then the TPP is one
of the greatest threats to democracy right now. And not just because it is
decided behind people’s backs, but because it sets in stone the rules about how
our public decisions in critical sectors of our space will be made.’
— Claudio Ruiz, Derechos Digitales (Chile)
Contact: Vladimir
Garay, Derechos Digitales, prensa@derechosdigitales.org, phone: (+56 2) 2702 7108;
USA
‘At best,
trade can be an engine for poverty reduction. At worst, free trade agreements
like the TPP can undermine universal human rights.
The devil
is in the details, and the details on the TPP are still secret. But the leaked
texts signal the worst case scenario. Oxfam welcomes the engagement of UN
experts and agrees that only a full human rights impact assessment will show
whether the agreement is written to benefit special interests or the wider
public interest.’
— Stephanie Burgos, Economic Justice
Policy Manager, Oxfam America
Contact: Laura Rusu,
Policy & Campaigns Media Manager Oxfam America, LRusu@OxfamAmerica.org, office phone: +1 (202) 496-1169, mobile phone: +1
(202) 459-3739
Mexico
‘In the
discussion on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and labor rights it is
fundamental that the signing states retake the concept of “decent work”, from
the International Labour Organisation, as a way to ratify their obligation to
guarantee the respect of labor rights (decent income, safe working conditions,
social security, liberty to free association, among the most important). For
Mexico, the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which
is the closest reference for what may occur with the implementation of the TPP,
led to the implementation of structural reforms that have meant the loss of
fundamental human rights such as: the right to work, the right to unionize, the
right to have access to decent income, the right to just working conditions and
to access justice.
The signing of these trade agreements, in which transnational
corporations play a determining role, shall, as a consequence, cause the
implementation of policies, translated into structural reforms, which shall
increase violations of rights and lead to the government’s failure to fulfil
its principle obligations: to protect, respect and guarantee human rights.’
— Alejandra Ancheita,
Executive Director of ProDESC (The Project of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
Mexico)
Contact: Adriana Aguilar, ProDESC, adriana@prodesc.org.mx, office phone: +52
(55) 5212 2230, +52 (55) 5212 2229, mobile phone: +52 1 55 15 03 24 10
